An analysis of examining the nature of hamlets madness

Examples of hamlets madness

Author: Brandon Johnson. With them, however, it is necessary for him to play a somewhat different role. But Hamlet takes his actions most often through reason. To Horatio alone he would probably not have hesitated to tell the whole story, but with Marcellus, a mere acquaintance, it is different. Throughout the play Hamlet takes on different personas, making it hard define him as only one character type. Look, how it steals away! Later on, alone with his one friend, Hamlet relates in minute detail the circumstances of his escape from being carried into England, and plainly announces his intention of killing the king. William Shakespeare, the writer of the tragic play Hamlet leaves the audience to decide whether Hamlet is truly mad or not. The possibility that Hamlet is mad when the play begins forces us to question the truth of everything he says, making his character even more mysterious. With this in view, the dramatist had of necessity to portray the hero's madness with all the traits of a real affliction; for, if the court could discover Hamlet's madness to be unreal, his design and purpose would be thereby defeated. This verily is not effected by delineating the mad antics of some unfortunate whose disordered mind leaves him helpless to the mercy of the shifting winds of circumstances, and irresponsible to the moral laws of human life. Hamlet's declared intention of assuming "an antic disposition," his assurance to his mother that he is only "mad in craft," the test he proposes in proof of his assertion, may all be conceded as valueless in determining the question. Another luminous index is Hamlet's intercourse with his school-fellow and sole bosom friend, the scholarly Horatio.

Both Hamlet and Ophelia act very strangely. Shakespeare left it up to the audience to decide whether he was truly crazy or not. In it, a young, Danish prince struggles with the death of his father and the betrayal of his mother.

how does hamlets madness affect the play

Near the end of the tragedy, Hamlet plays the part so well, that he convinces himself he is insane. Thus Dr.

This sudden question to Polonius has causes him to believe that Hamlet has a form of love-sickness sees as a form of madness. Throughout the play Hamlet has glimpses of sanity, but ultimately the tragedy of losing his father causes all of his idiotic behavior. His stratagem succeeds, and for a time he holds Horatio and Marcellus at arms' length.

However, there are also indications to the contrary, Hamlet only feigns madness for the purpose of carrying out his mission. There is much evidence in the play that causes one to believe that Hamlet is in fact crazy.

significance of madness in hamlet

Though, it might be a bit of over-aggrandizing to say that the first Act and second scene could be so crucial. There is a debate that if Hamlet is truly mad, or if he is faking being mad.

An analysis of examining the nature of hamlets madness

He feigned madness to enable him to buy time to make a decision and plan on how to kill Claudius. In the first act, Hamlet appears to be very straightforward in his actions and thoughts. Was Hamlet really suffering from madness, as many of his friends and family thought? On this question there are four different hypotheses: 1 That Hamlet was throughout perfectly sane, but feigned insanity; 2 that Hamlet was after his interview with the Ghost more or less insane; 3 that in Hamlet insanity was latent, but was only fully developed after the Court-play; 4 that Hamlet was neither insane, nor feigned to be so. Possibly,some spirit or demon may have taken over him thus his appearance as being hellish in nature or it could be that he had lost his wits to hell and thus is not aware of his appearance and we are made to believe that that he appears thus throughout most of the play. The objection, moreover, is not valid, because it is based upon a misinterpretation of the word madness. Most of the characters in this play suffered a heartbreaking death, although, all of the characters faced anger, regret, madness or distress. In his instructions to them, therefore, there is no admixture of "wild and whirling words"; nothing in fact that is not eminently judicious and to the point.

His portrayal is admittedly true to nature, and it is true to nature because a reflex or reproduction of what he himself had witnessed in demented unfortunates.

Rated 9/10 based on 42 review
Analysis on Hamlets Madness