Samples of writing a literature review
Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed? When it comes to learning how to do the literature review easily, then take advantage of our professional service for all the examples that you need!
How to write a literature review for a research paper
Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field? For instance, the review might examine whaling from pre, , and One should not assume the results obtained from studies using stories and word lists as stimuli can be generalised to forensic contexts. A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, such a narrow focus may not fully explain how people remember ref. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider: Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review. Then your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. So you check those out. This would help the author to get more recognition and the topic to be better researched. Supporting evidence … This suggests that the misinformation effect may be due at least partially to memory impairment, rather than just biased guessing. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material.
Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach? Proofread, proofread again! Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the writing process—take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.
Notice that Falk and Mills do quote certain terms that were coined by the author, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study.
For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art work. Following certain formats of style and always having well-written content, focused on the topic, critical and without losing its sense; the structure of the paper will create the whole importance of the subject being depicted.
Briefly reviews what has been found, and then identifies a gap.
The US National Park system became the dominant paradigm for analyzing relations between conservation, nationhood and nationalism. What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates.
based on 91 review